Michael Guido on November 12, 2013
Editor’s note: In his latest post, Senior Consultant Michael Guido offers tips and tricks from the trenches to help beginners become proficient visual modelers with Mendix.
Thanks to Mendix’s continued rapid growth (109% in the first half of 2013 alone), we are constantly training new folks on how to use the Mendix App Platform and its visual, model-driven development capabilities. As we work to continually increase the competency of our new customers, partners, and employees, I have seen a few reoccurring mistakes that beginners should avoid. In this post, I will outline nine pro tips to help beginners become better visual modelers with Mendix.
Please note: if you are a certified Mendix Engineer, you may want to scan the list of nine tips as a refresher. If you have not yet taken the Mendix Apprenticeship class, some of the concepts may not be familiar to you. In that case, bookmark this post and refer back to it afterwards!
Teams work best when everyone is on the same page. More often than not, intellectual consensus on a specific design ensures that all teams understand the desired functionality as well as the real-world relationships the system is being designed to support. If you do not understand the data model or have questions, ask! Confusion only leads to sloppy modeling which, in turn, leads to rework. The whole point of having a visual model is to facilitate discussion (a picture is worth a thousand words) and increase understanding. As one of my mentors eloquently states, “Once you build the data model, the application practically builds itself!”
I cannot stress just how important this first tip truly is. Model mastery / comprehension will accelerate:
New Mendix Engineers have a tendency to use the navigation panel on the left to try to find their way around an application. As the application grows and the names of forms and microflows begin to look similar, they sometimes end up creating duplicate forms and flows that do essentially the same thing.
Using the right click to navigate is one of the most critical habits for Mendix beginners to adopt. It will help you increase comprehension of the data model (Go to Entity) and improve your knowledge of the flow of an application.
If you are working on a team to develop an enterprise application, decide on some key naming standards up front and occasionally audit each other. This may seem a little harsh, but it really helps for large teams and projects. A few key things to discuss and agree upon are:
In the microflows above, the orange “splits” differ in their outgoing sequence. In the top microflow, at the first split, a “true” result from the condition forces the flow up (this is technically not incorrect, but it is confusing for other users). The bottom flow uses a consistent structure with the previously agreed up structure (the happy path follows the horizontal).
The Mendix Apprentice training has some really good content on best practice naming of microflows. If your team has agreed on something more suitable for you, that is fine too! Just be consistent and audit each other’s work occasionally. The time spent doing this up front will save significant time down the road in maintenance and debugging. Here are a few conventions I like to use:
Using Mendix to visually model applications can be very exciting coming from the world of spaghetti code. With microflows, you can quickly and easily label and model the business logic of your application. However, as time goes on (or as you are completing a repetitive microflow), it’s sometimes easy to mislabel a split or retrieve. When this happens, your application may not perform as it appears. The tip here is to ensure you use the debugger to confirm the modeler is manipulating the same entities and attributes that your labels suggest it should. I typically setup my debugger like this:
The Buttons at the bottom (Step Into, Step Over, Step Out, and Continue) allow you to step systematically through your microflow. The Red outline (currently around “Create Parent”) allow you to visualize where in the flow the Mendix is attempting to execute. Finally, the variable(s) pane on the left panel allows you to see the actual Entity and Attributes.
Beginners tend to look at their microflows and confidently predict that their logic is sound without realizing the label is not a true indication of the underlying attribute.
Excessive retrieves can drastically reduce performance in large applications, because they can take up server capacity (especially when multiple users are accessing the application simultaneously). Beginners will commonly use a retrieve then check if it is empty (for a GetOrCreate Subflow for example). A faster and more efficient way to do this is simply to check if the association exists, then act accordingly. Below is a simple data model and then two examples: the first showing a common “beginner” mistake and the second showing a more efficient retrieval.
Both flows accomplish the exact same thing (either returning the Parent of the Child, if it exists, or creating a new one and associating it to the Child).
However, Option 2 is more efficient because the Engineer understands the Child can have only Parent (because of the data model); see tip 1! Thus, if the association does not exist in Option 2 ($Child_1/MyFirstModule.Child_Parent = empty) , the engineer eliminates the retrieve and simply goes straight to Creating the $NewParent_1. In complicated models with multiple layers of subflows, minimizing the retrieves will improve performance.
This one goes all the way back to tip number 1! XPath constraints allow you to Constrain data based on the association with other tables. In other words, think of an XPath constraint as a join between two tables. In order to write XPath Constraints effectively, you should typically take the shortest possible path to the desired data to eliminate unnecessary joins. When writing XPath constraints, you can only compare variables to the contents of an association or with the value of an attribute. Furthermore, XPath constraints always consist of an odd number of elements. So [Parent_Child/Child = $Variable] is not possible but you can use: [Parent_Child = $Variable] or [Parent_Child/Child/id = $Variable] or [Parent_Child/Child/Name = $Variable/Name].
This tip sounds like a no brainer, but as a beginner, it can be easy to forget. Anytime you are performing a calculation (with numbers, dates, etc.) always be sure to check for empty values before performing the calculation. This is particularly important when using On Change microflows. To reference the microflow above (Calc_SumTwoNumbers), the actual calculation you should use is:
Where the Create Variable above should actually have the first two empty checks before performing the actual calculation and returning the value.
The last piece of advice applies to any software, and will always ring true. Before launching an application, make sure to test your work thoroughly. Automatically assume user will try to break your code model so attempt to make it as “iron-clad” as possible. The only way to do this is to test thoroughly and repeatedly.
What’s your best advice for beginners to Mendix and model-driven development? Do you have a favorite tip or trick that will help beginners get up to speed more quickly? Please share them in the comments below! Thanks for reading and happy modeling.
Receive Mendix platform tips, tricks, and other resources straight to your inbox every two weeks.